From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932248AbWLLRsb (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:48:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932270AbWLLRsb (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:48:31 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.25]:50241 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932248AbWLLRsb (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:48:31 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 09:48:20 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] lockdep: fix seqlock_init() Message-Id: <20061212094820.1049a252.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20061212111028.GA13908@elte.hu> References: <20061212111028.GA13908@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:10:28 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > +#define seqlock_init(x) \ > + do { \ > + (x)->sequence = 0; \ > + spin_lock_init(&(x)->lock); \ > + } while (0) This does not have to be a macro, does it?