mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] IOPL handling for paravirt guests
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:52:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200612150652.kBF6q9e0025520@zach-dev.vmware.com> (raw)

I found a clever way to make the extra IOPL switching invisible to
non-paravirt compiles - since kernel_rpl is statically defined to
be zero there, and only non-zero rpl kernel have a problem restoring IOPL,
as popf does not restore IOPL flags unless run at CPL-0.

Subject: IOPL handling for paravirt guests
Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>

diff -r 8110943fd7ad arch/i386/kernel/process.c
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/process.c	Thu Dec 14 16:15:20 2006 -0800
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/process.c	Thu Dec 14 16:21:57 2006 -0800
@@ -665,6 +665,15 @@ struct task_struct fastcall * __switch_t
 	load_TLS(next, cpu);
 
 	/*
+	 * Restore IOPL if needed.  In normal use, the flags restore
+	 * in the switch assembly will handle this.  But if the kernel
+	 * is running virtualized at a non-zero CPL, the popf will
+	 * not restore flags, so it must be done in a separate step.
+	 */
+	if (get_kernel_rpl() && unlikely(prev->iopl != next->iopl))
+		set_iopl_mask(next->iopl);
+
+	/*
 	 * Now maybe handle debug registers and/or IO bitmaps
 	 */
 	if (unlikely((task_thread_info(next_p)->flags & _TIF_WORK_CTXSW)

                 reply	other threads:[~2006-12-15  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200612150652.kBF6q9e0025520@zach-dev.vmware.com \
    --to=zach@vmware.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®