From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932556AbWLSA7P (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:59:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932569AbWLSA7O (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:59:14 -0500 Received: from smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.207]:23289 "HELO smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932556AbWLSA7O (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:59:14 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=1DKUx1BLM4zIk823U1yZoBKeI3rC7u1gw4kVyFKq9aGc5cCD1F75Cb3KQJ2ihP2jWwJEiefWOzMYfm8MYSxii3jOCehWBDSpt61IBNfuJK7KjkcJKAIZtITGyPA4USXigoWuZn9NQ65jmDll1h98u3H4Ph4la1PyX8PlQ2jDaeY= ; X-YMail-OSG: bX9iXwkVM1m_oUGR_jSXvcgY9l6J5iSVa71sXb01tXlMXOtNCLjzvTR7dStqJG5yto9FHTjcWBELJ28ZwvzQ2ov9RQj_j94WQtSRSK4nOlQSlVJVHw5uBCJfTpovVqaprx5HqCbFwMHUVzqm2Imc1.QItZFN_7A7A22VkC.J40NsKxnbUX51GOBOHSfD From: David Brownell To: Paul Sokolovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTC classdev: Add sysfs support for wakeup alarm (r/w) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:59:11 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Alessandro Zummo , kernel-discuss@handhelds.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1866913935.20061217213036@gmail.com> <256202025.20061219015824@gmail.com> <200612181654.30864.david-b@pacbell.net> In-Reply-To: <200612181654.30864.david-b@pacbell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200612181659.11473.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 18 December 2006 4:54 pm, David Brownell wrote: > > http://handhelds.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/linux/kernel26/drivers/rtc/rtc-sa1100.c.diff?r1=1.5&r2=1.6&f=h > > That patch you applied looks right to me -- why don't you forward it > to Alessandro as a bugfix for 2.6.20-rc2, and save me the effort? Actually, correction: it'd be correct if you ripped out the buggy calls to manage the irq wake mechanism. A later message will show how those need to work. (The IRQ framework will give one helpful hint when it warns about mismatched enable/disable calls ...) - Dave