From: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: jens.axboe@oracle.com
Cc: agk@redhat.com, mchristi@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com, k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] rqbased-dm: add block layer hook
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:52:46 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061220.165246.85417944.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061220134924.GG10535@kernel.dk>
Hi Jens,
Sorry for the less explanation.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:49:24 +0100, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19 2006, Kiyoshi Ueda wrote:
> > This patch adds new "end_io_first" hook in __end_that_request_first()
> > for request-based device-mapper.
>
> What's this for, lack of stacking?
I don't understand the meaning of "lack of stacking" well but
I guess that it means "Is the existing hook in end_that_request_last()
not enough?" If so, the answer is no.
(If the geuss is wrong, please let me know.)
The new hook is needed for error handling in dm.
For example, when an error occurred on a request, dm-multipath
wants to try another path before returning EIO to application.
Without the new hook, at the point of end_that_request_last(),
the bios are already finished with error and can't be retried.
Thanks,
Kiyoshi Ueda
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-20 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-19 22:11 Kiyoshi Ueda
2006-12-20 13:49 ` Jens Axboe
2006-12-20 21:52 ` Kiyoshi Ueda [this message]
2006-12-21 7:49 ` Jens Axboe
2006-12-21 22:22 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2006-12-21 22:56 ` business1
2006-12-22 7:18 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Christie
2006-12-22 19:55 ` Kiyoshi Ueda
2006-12-21 23:00 ` business1
2006-12-21 22:56 ` business1
2006-12-21 22:53 ` business1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061220.165246.85417944.k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--to=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchristi@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®