From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update Documentation/pci.txt v7
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 11:16:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061224111622.e22bfd8a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061224060726.GC24131@colo.lackof.org>
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 23:07:26 -0700 Grant Grundler wrote:
> +10. Legacy I/O port free driver
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That subject (and patches with similar subject) confuses me.
It's difficult to associate the adjectives correctly.
I suppose it just needs some hyphens/dashes, like:
10. Legacy-I/O-port-free driver
but that's ETOOMUCH. Maybe ?
10. Stop using legacy I/O space
> +Large servers may not be able to provide I/O port resources to all PCI
> +devices. I/O Port space is only 64KB on Intel Architecture[1] and is
> +likely also fragmented since the I/O base register of PCI-to-PCI
> +bridge will usually be aligned to a 4KB boundary[2]. On such systems,
> +pci_enable_device() and pci_request_region() will fail when
> +attempting to enable I/O Port regions that don't have I/O Port
> +resources assigned.
> +11. MMIO Space and "Write Posting"
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +Converting a driver from using I/O Port space to using MMIO space
> +often requires some additional changes. Specifically, "write posting"
> +needs to be handled. Many drivers (e.g. tg3, acenic, sym53c8xx_2)
> +already do this. I/O Port space guarantees write transactions reach the PCI
> +device before the CPU can continue. Writes to MMIO space allow the CPU
> +to continue before the transaction reaches the PCI device. HW weenies
> +call this "Write Posting" because the write completion is "posted" to
> +the CPU before the transaction has reached its destination.
> +
> +Thus, timing sensitive code should add readl() where the CPU is
> +expected to wait before doing other work. The classic "bit banging"
> +sequence works fine for I/O Port space:
> +
> + for (i=8; --i; val >>= 1) {
Please use: i = 8;
to match CodingStyle. (and below)
> + outb(val & 1, ioport_reg); /* write bit */
> + udelay(10);
> + }
> +
> +The same sequence for MMIO space should be:
> +
> + for (i=8; --i; val >>= 1) {
> + writeb(val & 1, mmio_reg); /* write bit */
> + readb(safe_mmio_reg); /* flush posted write */
> + udelay(10);
> + }
Rest looks good to me.
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-24 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-22 8:05 [PATCH 1/5] Update Documentation/pci.txt Hidetoshi Seto
2006-11-22 8:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-11-22 18:28 ` Grant Grundler
2006-11-24 0:38 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2006-11-24 5:12 ` Grant Grundler
2006-11-24 6:05 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2006-12-06 7:26 ` Greg KH
2006-12-07 3:55 ` Grant Grundler
2006-12-10 7:25 ` Grant Grundler
2006-12-15 17:02 ` Greg KH
2006-12-18 7:11 ` Grant Grundler
2006-12-22 19:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-22 21:52 ` Stefan Richter
2006-12-24 6:11 ` Grant Grundler
2006-12-24 6:07 ` [PATCH] Update Documentation/pci.txt v7 Grant Grundler
2006-12-24 19:16 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2006-12-25 7:59 ` Grant Grundler
2006-12-25 8:06 ` Grant Grundler
2006-12-25 8:08 ` Grant Grundler
2007-01-02 21:45 ` Greg KH
2007-01-03 7:15 ` Grant Grundler
2006-12-25 9:04 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2007-01-16 22:26 ` patch pci-rework-documentation-pci.txt.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree gregkh
2007-01-17 9:10 ` Jiri Slaby
2007-01-17 19:21 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061224111622.e22bfd8a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome