From: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
To: "D. Hazelton" <dhazelton@enter.net>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
Alistair John Strachan <s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: kernel + gcc 4.1 = several problems
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:05:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200701030205.l0325lki008679@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Message from "D. Hazelton" <dhazelton@enter.net> of "Tue, 02 Jan 2007 18:41:33 CDT." <200701021841.34002.dhazelton@enter.net>
D. Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net> wrote:
[...]
> None. I didn't file a report on this because I didn't find the big, just
> noted a problem that appears to occur. In this case the call's generated
> seem to wrap loops - something I've never heard of anyone doing.
Example code showing this weirdness?
> These
> *might* be causing the off-by-one that is causing the function to
> re-enter in the middle of an instruction.
If something like this happened, programs would be crashing left and right.
> Seeing this I'd guess that this follows for all system-level code
> generated by 4.1.1
Define "system-level code". What makes it different from, say,
bog-of-the-mill compiler code (yes, gcc compiles itself as part of its
sanity checking)?
> and this is exactly what I was reporting. If you'd
> like I'll go dig up the dumps he posted and post the two related segments
> side-by-side to give you a better example what I'm referring to.
If the related segments show code that is somehow wrong, by all means
report it /with your detailed analysis/ to the compiler people. Just a
warning, gcc is pretty smart in what it does, its code is often surprising
to the unwashed. Also, the C standard is subtle, the error might be in a
unwarranted assumption in the source code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-03 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 14:21 Oops in 2.6.19.1 Alistair John Strachan
2006-12-20 16:30 ` Greg KH
2006-12-20 16:44 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-12-23 15:40 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-12-27 2:07 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-12-27 12:35 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-12-28 2:41 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2006-12-28 4:02 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-12-28 4:14 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-12-30 16:59 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-12-31 13:47 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-12-31 16:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-12-31 16:55 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-01-02 21:10 ` kernel + gcc 4.1 = several problems Adrian Bunk
2007-01-02 21:56 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-01-02 22:06 ` D. Hazelton
2007-01-02 23:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-02 23:41 ` D. Hazelton
2007-01-03 2:05 ` Horst H. von Brand [this message]
2007-01-02 22:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-02 23:18 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-01-03 1:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-02 22:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-02 23:09 ` David Rientjes
2007-01-03 2:12 Mikael Pettersson
2007-01-03 2:20 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-01-05 15:53 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-01-05 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-05 16:19 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-01-05 16:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-07 0:36 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-07 0:57 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-01-03 5:55 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-03 10:29 ` Alan
2007-01-03 10:32 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2007-01-03 11:51 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-03 12:44 ` Alan
2007-01-03 13:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-01-03 13:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-01-03 14:28 ` Alan
2007-01-03 16:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-03 16:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-03 17:01 ` l.genoni
2007-01-03 17:45 ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-03 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-03 17:06 ` l.genoni
2007-01-03 17:53 ` Mariusz Kozlowski
2007-01-03 19:47 ` Denis Vlasenko
2007-01-03 20:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-03 21:48 ` Denis Vlasenko
2007-01-03 22:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-03 21:44 ` Thomas Sailer
2007-01-03 22:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 3:08 ` Zou, Nanhai
2007-01-04 15:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 7:11 Albert Cahalan
2007-01-04 16:43 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-04 17:04 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-01-04 17:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-04 17:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 18:53 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-04 19:10 ` Al Viro
2007-01-05 17:17 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-06 8:23 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-04 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 18:34 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-04 22:02 ` Geert Bosch
2007-01-07 4:25 ` Denis Vlasenko
2007-01-07 4:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-07 5:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-07 15:10 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-01-26 22:05 ` Michael K. Edwards
2007-01-04 18:08 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200701030205.l0325lki008679@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl \
--to=vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=dhazelton@enter.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®