mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED PATCH] fix memory corruption from misinterpreted bad_inode_ops return values
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:26:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070103162643.5c479836.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <459C4038.6020902@redhat.com>

On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:46:00 -0600
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:

> Take 2... all in one file.  I suppose I really did know better than 
> to create that new header.   ;-) 
> 
> Better?
> 
> ---
> 
> CVE-2006-5753 is for a case where an inode can be marked bad, switching 
> the ops to bad_inode_ops, which are all connected as:
> 
> static int return_EIO(void)
> {
>         return -EIO;
> }
> 
> #define EIO_ERROR ((void *) (return_EIO))
> 
> static struct inode_operations bad_inode_ops =
> {
>         .create         = bad_inode_create
> ...etc...
> 
> The problem here is that the void cast causes return types to not be 
> promoted, and for ops such as listxattr which expect more than 32 bits of
> return value, the 32-bit -EIO is interpreted as a large positive 64-bit 
> number, i.e. 0x00000000fffffffa instead of 0xfffffffa.
> 
> This goes particularly badly when the return value is taken as a number of
> bytes to copy into, say, a user's buffer for example...
> 
> I originally had coded up the fix by creating a return_EIO_<TYPE> macro
> for each return type, like this:
> 
> static int return_EIO_int(void)
> {
> 	return -EIO;
> }
> #define EIO_ERROR_INT ((void *) (return_EIO_int))
> 
> static struct inode_operations bad_inode_ops =
> {
> 	.create		= EIO_ERROR_INT,
> ...etc...
> 
> but Al felt that it was probably better to create an EIO-returner for each 
> actual op signature.  Since so few ops share a signature, I just went ahead 
> & created an EIO function for each individual file & inode op that returns
> a value.
> 

Al is correct, of course.  But the patch takes bad_inode.o from 280 up to 703
bytes, which is a bit sad for some cosmetic thing which nobody ever looks
at or modifies.

Perhaps you can do

static int return_EIO_int(void)
{
	return -EIO;
}

static int bad_file_release(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
	__attribute__((alias("return_EIO_int")));
static int bad_file_fsync(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
	__attribute__((alias("return_EIO_int")));

etcetera?

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-04  0:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-03 23:46 Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04  0:26 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-01-04 17:51   ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 18:26     ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 18:33       ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 18:54         ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 19:09           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 19:14             ` Al Viro
2007-01-04 19:22               ` Al Viro
2007-01-04 19:32                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-07  2:14                 ` Roman Zippel
2007-01-04 19:30               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 20:24                 ` Al Viro
2007-01-04 21:00                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 21:04                     ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 21:10                       ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 21:18                         ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 21:30                           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 21:50                             ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 21:52                             ` Al Viro
2007-01-04 22:38                               ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2007-01-04 22:35                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 22:48                                   ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 23:06                                   ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 23:17                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 23:28                                       ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 23:21                                   ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2007-01-04 23:52                                     ` Al Viro
2007-01-05  5:59                                       ` Duplicated functions (was: fix memory corruption from misinterpreted bad_inode_ops return values) Mitchell Blank Jr
2007-01-05 15:40                                       ` [UPDATED PATCH] fix memory corruption from misinterpreted bad_inode_ops return values Arjan van de Ven
2007-01-04 19:23 Mikael Pettersson
     [not found] <7zo1U-ht-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <7zoEG-1kW-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <7zF2R-1wJ-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <7zFvU-2p5-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <7zFFr-2AP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <7zFYY-31i-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <7zGie-3Ji-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]             ` <7zGif-3Ji-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]               ` <7zGBC-49g-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]                 ` <7zHnX-5rJ-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]                   ` <7zI0B-6x2-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]                     ` <7zI0B-6x2-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]                       ` <7zIak-6JF-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]                         ` <7zIak-6JF-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-01-05 16:33                           ` Bodo Eggert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070103162643.5c479836.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome