From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED PATCH] fix memory corruption from misinterpreted bad_inode_ops return values
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:26:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070103162643.5c479836.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <459C4038.6020902@redhat.com>
On Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:46:00 -0600
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:
> Take 2... all in one file. I suppose I really did know better than
> to create that new header. ;-)
>
> Better?
>
> ---
>
> CVE-2006-5753 is for a case where an inode can be marked bad, switching
> the ops to bad_inode_ops, which are all connected as:
>
> static int return_EIO(void)
> {
> return -EIO;
> }
>
> #define EIO_ERROR ((void *) (return_EIO))
>
> static struct inode_operations bad_inode_ops =
> {
> .create = bad_inode_create
> ...etc...
>
> The problem here is that the void cast causes return types to not be
> promoted, and for ops such as listxattr which expect more than 32 bits of
> return value, the 32-bit -EIO is interpreted as a large positive 64-bit
> number, i.e. 0x00000000fffffffa instead of 0xfffffffa.
>
> This goes particularly badly when the return value is taken as a number of
> bytes to copy into, say, a user's buffer for example...
>
> I originally had coded up the fix by creating a return_EIO_<TYPE> macro
> for each return type, like this:
>
> static int return_EIO_int(void)
> {
> return -EIO;
> }
> #define EIO_ERROR_INT ((void *) (return_EIO_int))
>
> static struct inode_operations bad_inode_ops =
> {
> .create = EIO_ERROR_INT,
> ...etc...
>
> but Al felt that it was probably better to create an EIO-returner for each
> actual op signature. Since so few ops share a signature, I just went ahead
> & created an EIO function for each individual file & inode op that returns
> a value.
>
Al is correct, of course. But the patch takes bad_inode.o from 280 up to 703
bytes, which is a bit sad for some cosmetic thing which nobody ever looks
at or modifies.
Perhaps you can do
static int return_EIO_int(void)
{
return -EIO;
}
static int bad_file_release(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
__attribute__((alias("return_EIO_int")));
static int bad_file_fsync(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
__attribute__((alias("return_EIO_int")));
etcetera?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-04 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-03 23:46 Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 0:26 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-01-04 17:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 18:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 18:33 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 18:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 19:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 19:14 ` Al Viro
2007-01-04 19:22 ` Al Viro
2007-01-04 19:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-07 2:14 ` Roman Zippel
2007-01-04 19:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 20:24 ` Al Viro
2007-01-04 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 21:04 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 21:10 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 21:18 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 21:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 21:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 21:52 ` Al Viro
2007-01-04 22:38 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2007-01-04 22:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 22:48 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 23:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-04 23:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-04 23:28 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-04 23:21 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2007-01-04 23:52 ` Al Viro
2007-01-05 5:59 ` Duplicated functions (was: fix memory corruption from misinterpreted bad_inode_ops return values) Mitchell Blank Jr
2007-01-05 15:40 ` [UPDATED PATCH] fix memory corruption from misinterpreted bad_inode_ops return values Arjan van de Ven
2007-01-04 19:23 Mikael Pettersson
[not found] <7zo1U-ht-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zoEG-1kW-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zF2R-1wJ-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zFvU-2p5-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zFFr-2AP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zFYY-31i-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zGie-3Ji-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zGif-3Ji-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zGBC-49g-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zHnX-5rJ-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zI0B-6x2-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zI0B-6x2-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zIak-6JF-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <7zIak-6JF-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-01-05 16:33 ` Bodo Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070103162643.5c479836.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome