From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: "J.H." <warthog9@kernel.org>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hpa@zytor.com, webmaster@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KORG] Re: kernel.org lies about latest -mm kernel
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:52:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070107115228.15f25301.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1168111275.2505.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 11:21:15 -0800 J.H. wrote:
> It's an issue of load, and both machines are running 'hot' so to speak.
> When the loads on the machines climbs our update rsyncs take longer to
> complete (considering that our loads are completely based on I/O this
> isn't surprising). More or less nothing has changed since:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/14/347 with the exception that git & gitweb
> are no longer the concern we have (the caching layer I put into
> kernel.org seems to be taking care of the worst problems we were seeing
> and I have a couple more to put up this weekend), right now it's getting
> loads between the two machines load evened out and lowering the number
> of allowed rsyncs on each machine to better bound the load problem.
Hi,
I'm sure that all of this ext3fs etc. discussion is good,
but let me clarify: I would be much happier if the kernel.org
main page and the finger_banner info were updated at the same
time that new tarballs were put onto kernel.org.
Now someone may say that this is still the rsync/load problem,
but from a customer perspective, it's bad.
> On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 10:33 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:52:51 -0800 J.H. wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 07:34 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 11:30:34AM -0800, J.H. wrote:
> > > > (...)
> > > >
> > > > > So we know the problem is there, and we are working on it - we are
> > > > > getting e-mails about it if not daily than every other day or so. If
> > > > > there are suggestions we are willing to hear them - but the general
> > > > > feeling with the admins is that we are probably hitting the biggest
> > > > > problems already.
> > > >
> > > > BTW, yesterday my 2.4 patches were not published, but I noticed that
> > > > they were not even signed not bziped on hera. At first I simply thought
> > > > it was related, but right now I have a doubt. Maybe the automatic script
> > > > has been temporarily been disabled on hera too ?
> > >
> > > The script that deals with the uploads also deals with the packaging -
> > > so yes the problem is related.
> >
> > and with the finger_banner and version info on www.kernel.org page?
> >
> > They currently say:
> >
> > The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.19.1
> > The latest prepatch for the stable Linux kernel tree is: 2.6.20-rc3
> > The latest snapshot for the stable Linux kernel tree is: 2.6.20-rc3-git4
> > The latest 2.4 version of the Linux kernel is: 2.4.34
> > The latest 2.2 version of the Linux kernel is: 2.2.26
> > The latest prepatch for the 2.2 Linux kernel tree is: 2.2.27-rc2
> > The latest -mm patch to the stable Linux kernels is: 2.6.20-rc2-mm1
> >
> >
> > but there are 2.6.20-rc3-git[567] and 2.6.20-rc3-mm1 out there,
> > so when is the finger version info updated?
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-07 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-14 22:37 Pavel Machek
2006-12-14 23:01 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-14 23:38 ` Sergio Monteiro Basto
2006-12-16 17:44 ` [KORG] " Randy Dunlap
2006-12-16 17:57 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-16 18:02 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-16 19:30 ` J.H.
2006-12-16 20:30 ` Russell King
2006-12-26 16:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-12-16 21:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-12-26 16:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-07 3:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-01-07 4:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-07 4:47 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-01-07 4:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-07 4:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-07 20:11 ` Greg KH
2007-01-07 21:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-07 5:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-07 5:24 ` How git affects kernel.org performance H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-07 5:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-07 8:55 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-07 8:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-07 9:03 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-07 10:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-07 10:52 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-07 18:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-07 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <9e4733910701071126r7931042eldfb73060792f4f41@mail.gmail.com>
2007-01-07 19:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-07 10:50 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-07 18:49 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-07 19:07 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-07 19:28 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-07 19:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-07 9:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-07 9:38 ` Rene Herman
2007-01-08 3:05 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2007-01-08 12:58 ` Theodore Tso
2007-01-08 13:41 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2007-01-08 13:56 ` Theodore Tso
2007-01-08 13:59 ` Pavel Machek
2007-01-08 14:17 ` Theodore Tso
2007-01-08 13:43 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-09 1:09 ` Paul Jackson
2007-01-09 2:18 ` Jeremy Higdon
[not found] ` <20070109075945.GA8799@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-01-09 7:59 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-01-09 16:23 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <20070110015739.GA26978@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-01-10 1:57 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-01-10 3:20 ` Nigel Cunningham
[not found] ` <20070110140730.GA986@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-01-10 14:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-01-12 10:54 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-01-07 14:57 ` Robert Fitzsimons
2007-01-07 19:12 ` J.H.
2007-01-08 1:51 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-01-07 15:06 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-01-07 20:31 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-08 14:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-01-09 4:29 ` [KORG] Re: kernel.org lies about latest -mm kernel Nigel Cunningham
2007-01-09 5:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-01-09 5:51 ` Nigel Cunningham
2006-12-17 12:32 ` Pavel Machek
2006-12-17 13:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-17 18:23 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-17 22:37 ` Matti Aarnio
2006-12-18 0:42 ` J.H.
2006-12-19 6:46 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-12-19 7:39 ` J.H.
2006-12-19 13:32 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-12-19 14:36 ` Dave Jones
2006-12-19 14:38 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-12-26 16:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-08 20:10 ` Jean Delvare
2006-12-19 6:34 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-12-19 6:52 ` J.H.
2007-01-06 18:33 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-01-06 19:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-06 19:35 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-06 19:37 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-01-06 20:13 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-06 20:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-19 19:27 ` [PATCH] sysctl: vfs_cache_divisor Randy Dunlap
2007-03-19 20:36 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-19 20:42 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-03-20 4:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-21 23:01 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-03-21 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2007-03-23 0:07 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-23 20:36 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-03-23 20:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-03-24 0:45 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-24 1:17 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-20 19:53 ` Ingo Oeser
2007-01-06 23:50 ` [KORG] Re: kernel.org lies about latest -mm kernel H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-06 20:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-01-06 20:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-06 20:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-06 20:36 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-06 19:21 ` J.H.
2007-01-07 19:52 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2007-01-07 23:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-12-26 17:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-01-08 19:31 ` Jean Delvare
2007-01-08 19:37 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-01-08 22:05 ` Jean Delvare
2006-12-19 15:37 ` Tim Schmielau
2007-01-08 21:20 ` Jean Delvare
2007-01-08 21:33 ` J.H.
2007-01-09 7:01 ` Jean Delvare
2007-01-09 7:25 ` J.H.
2007-01-09 13:36 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070107115228.15f25301.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=warthog9@kernel.org \
--cc=webmaster@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome