From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752175AbXA0DKr (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:10:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752169AbXA0DKr (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:10:47 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:45628 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751760AbXA0DKq (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jan 2007 22:10:46 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 19:10:45 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20070126.191045.48529536.davem@davemloft.net> To: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, deweerdt@free.fr, netdev@vger.kernel.org, frederik.deweerdt@gmail.com, shemminger@osdl.org Subject: Re: + oops-in-drivers-net-shaperc.patch added to -mm tree From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20070125.193128.39155864.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Herbert Xu Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:45:05 +1100 > David Miller wrote: > > > > Shaper is actually OK. None of these hardware header callbacks > > should be invoked if the device is down. Yet, this is what is > > accidently being allowed in the AF_PACKET socket layer. > > Hmm, what if the device goes down after the check? For the shaper case it's OK, because once a shaper is associated it's ->dev never goes back to NULL. In general, yes it's a problem :-/