From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Cc: Raphael Assenat <raph@8d.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add PCI device ID for IT8152 RISC-to-PCI chip
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:30:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070213153029.GB15227@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070213151633.GL7584@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:16:33AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be very many
> arm systems with PCI, so it's hard to tell.
NetWinder, EBSA285 (which the NetWinder is a derivative of), the N2100,
etc are PCI based and are all well proven in the field.
However, I have come across issues with what I suspect are buggy
bridges - some southbridges require out of band cache control
signalling and don't behave properly if you don't provide this (despite
having modes to disable such signalling) and some PCMCIA bridges which
don't like delayed read responses from host bridges.
That said, I've an EBSA285 with Promise UDMA, 3com NIC, S3 VGA and a
plug-in southbridge card which has been running since about 1999 or so
and the only real data corruption problem I've heard of was when a track
on my Promise UDMA card was eaten by the sticky label resulting in silent
corruption of writes to the disks.
(I did consider replacing the Promise UDMA card, but the IT821x card
I bought to replace it didn't have all the pins on the chip soldered
down - to the extent that even a PC couldn't recognise the PCI card.
So I'm running on the assumption that the self-repaired Promise UDMA
card is all round going to be more reliable than the as yet unproven
IT821x card.)
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-13 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-09 20:14 Raphael Assenat
2007-02-09 21:28 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-02-13 14:45 ` Raphael Assenat
2007-02-13 15:16 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-02-13 15:30 ` Russell King [this message]
2007-02-13 15:47 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-02-13 16:20 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070213153029.GB15227@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=raph@8d.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®