From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 1/4] freezer-cpu-hotplug core
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 12:46:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070216071617.GB4527@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070214202209.GC301@tv-sign.ru>
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:22:09PM +0300, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > o Splits CPU_DEAD into two events namely
> > - CPU_DEAD: which will be handled while the processes are still
> > frozen.
> >
> > - CPU_DEAD_KILL_THREADS: To be handled after we thaw_processes.
>
>
> Imho, this is not right. This change the meaning of CPU_DEAD, and so
> we should fix all users of CPU_DEAD as well.
Why should we fix all users? Only users who were doing a kthread_stop()
in CPU_DEAD need to be fixed. From my count, only 5 users (out of a
total of 35) need to be fixed to not do kthread_stop in CPU_DEAD.
>
> How about
>
> CPU_DEAD_WHATEVER
> the processes are still frozen
>
> CPU_DEAD
> after we thaw_processes
>
> This way we can add processing of the new CPU_DEAD_WHATEVER event where
> it may help.
Well, -most- of the work needs to be done in a state when processes are
frozen. The only exception is cleaning up of per-cpu threads (which is
not possible with processes frozen - if we can find a way to make that
possible, then everything can be done in CPU_DEAD).
If we go by the change suggested above, then we need to fix all users of
CPU_DEAD to do what they are doing in CPU_DEAD_WHATEVER (when processes
are frozen). I would rather avoid this invasive change and let
CPU_DEAD be sent with processes frozen still.
> CPU_UP_PREPARE is called after freeze_processes()... Probably this works,
> but imho this is no good. Suppose for a moment that khelper will be frozen
> (yes, yes it can't be), then we can't do kthread_create().
Yes, I am worried about doing so many things with processes frozen.
Maybe time (and more testing) will tell us if this is a bad thing or
not. The only dependency I have found so far is that kthread workqueue needs to
be up (and hence its worker thread needs to be exempted from hotplug
freeze). We should mark kthread workqueue accordingly as not freezable
for hotplug.
--
Regards,
vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-16 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-14 14:40 [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 0/4] Freezer based Cpu-hotplug Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-14 14:42 ` [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 1/4] freezer-cpu-hotplug core Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-14 14:43 ` [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 2/4] Revert changes to workqueue.c Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-14 14:43 ` [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 3/4] Revert changes to sched.c and slab.c Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-14 14:44 ` [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 4/4] Rip out lock_cpu_hotplug from linux Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-14 14:59 ` [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 2/4] Revert changes to workqueue.c Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-14 15:24 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-14 20:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-14 20:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-16 5:26 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-16 15:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-16 16:47 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-16 18:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-16 23:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-17 2:29 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-17 21:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-20 15:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-20 20:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-21 6:29 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-21 14:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-21 14:37 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-21 15:53 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-14 15:31 ` [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 1/4] freezer-cpu-hotplug core Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-14 19:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-16 6:48 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-16 15:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-14 20:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-16 7:16 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-02-16 8:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-16 9:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-16 9:59 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-16 11:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-16 19:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-17 2:31 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-02-17 5:32 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-17 11:19 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-16 16:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-14 21:43 ` [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 0/4] Freezer based Cpu-hotplug Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-15 6:34 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-15 8:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-15 12:20 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-15 13:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-15 14:25 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-17 11:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-17 21:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-17 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-17 23:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-17 23:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-18 10:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-18 11:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-18 12:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-18 14:52 ` freezer problems Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-18 15:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-18 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-18 18:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-18 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-18 22:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-18 23:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-19 20:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-19 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-19 22:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-19 23:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-20 0:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-20 0:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-20 0:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-20 18:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-20 18:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-21 18:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-02-21 18:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-21 18:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-02-21 20:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-21 20:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-21 21:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-02-21 23:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-22 10:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-22 11:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-22 17:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-22 17:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-22 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-23 18:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-23 3:02 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-18 15:09 ` [RFC PATCH(Experimental) 0/4] Freezer based Cpu-hotplug Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-18 16:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-18 18:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-18 10:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-18 11:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-18 12:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-02-18 15:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-02-18 12:56 ` Pavel Machek
2007-02-21 14:52 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2007-02-21 19:42 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <200702231041.17136.rjw@sisk.pl>
[not found] ` <20070223100817.GA10973@in.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <200702231115.00718.rjw@sisk.pl>
[not found] ` <20070223104723.GB10973@in.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20070223110201.GC10973@in.ibm.com>
2007-02-23 19:03 ` freezer problems Gautham R Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070216071617.GB4527@in.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®