From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: radeon breaks with clocksource_jiffies
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:03:28 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070223.140328.74752162.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070223.134505.74749340.davem@davemloft.net>
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:45:05 -0800 (PST)
> While probeing PLL information via radeon_get_pllinfo(), it does a
> "gettimeofday(); do_something(); gettimeofday();" type sequence
> explicitly with interrupts disabled, so ends up with a zero
> measurement which then results in a bunch of divisions by zero.
>
> We should decide whether gettimeofday() can be expected to advance with
> interrupts disabled, or that clocksource_jiffies is simply invalid because
> of this behavior.
Actually, with clocksource based gettimeofday(), radeon built-in cannot
work at all.
The reason is that the clocksource code will not jump over to a
clock source other than clocksource_jiffies until the late initcalls
are run, because of this code:
/* clocksource_done_booting - Called near the end of bootup
*
* Hack to avoid lots of clocksource churn at boot time
*/
static int __init clocksource_done_booting(void)
{
finished_booting = 1;
return 0;
}
late_initcall(clocksource_done_booting);
...
struct clocksource *clocksource_get_next(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&clocksource_lock, flags);
if (next_clocksource && finished_booting) {
curr_clocksource = next_clocksource;
next_clocksource = NULL;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clocksource_lock, flags);
return curr_clocksource;
}
So even if other clock sources are provided, they'll never show up until
after the radeon driver tries to initialize.
I understand the intention of the clocksource_get_next() code, it doesn't
want to hop onto several different clocksource implementations as the
drivers for those startup, but going through all the module_init() calls
for various drivers without a sane clocksource is just as bad of a problem
and is in fact fatal in this radeon case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-23 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-23 21:45 David Miller
2007-02-23 22:03 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-02-23 22:10 ` john stultz-lkml
2007-02-23 22:32 ` David Miller
[not found] ` <1f1b08da0702231408l19207805o5555ee3ebf6bd426@mail.gmail.com>
2007-02-23 22:13 ` john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070223.140328.74752162.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®