From: Markku Savela <msa@moth.iki.fi>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ipv4 and ipv6 stacks for new link layers?
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:49:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702231149.l1NBnlZD029626@moth.iki.fi> (raw)
The IPv6 and IPv4 both seem to be rather akwardly hardcoded to support
only link layers they know.
This is a pity, because it would be so easy to make the both stacks
totally independent of the actual link layers. It only needs one (or
two) new function pointer in net_device. This function should do the
conversion from IPv4/IPv6 address into corresponding hardware
multicast/broadcast address.
In both IPv4 and IPv6, all places where symbols ARPHRD_* are
reference, are suspect (there are some related to tunnels, which may
be appropriate). For example, in ipv4/arp.c arp_mc_map would call this
mapping function, if provided. Similarly ipv6/ndisc.c ndisc_mc_map.
In ipv6/addrconf.c the ivp6_generate_eui64 may possibly need yet
another netdev function provided by the driver.
The current Ethernet specific code for these mappings could be moved
from the ipv6/ipv6 into eth.c, and ether_setup would give defaults for
the functions.
[I run into this while trying to do a netdev to a device is not known
by the stacks, and IPv6 even refuses to start on it (because of the
ivp6_generate_eui64 fails?). IPv4 ARP seems to fall back to broadcast,
so it sort of starts]
--
Markku Savela
next reply other threads:[~2007-02-23 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-23 11:49 Markku Savela [this message]
2007-02-23 13:47 ` Neil Horman
2007-02-24 0:26 ` David Miller
2007-02-24 16:00 ` Olaf Titz
2007-02-24 16:45 ` Markku Savela
2007-02-25 0:52 ` David Miller
2007-02-25 10:27 ` Olaf Titz
2007-02-25 11:21 Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200702231149.l1NBnlZD029626@moth.iki.fi \
--to=msa@moth.iki.fi \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®