mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markku Savela <msa@moth.iki.fi>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ipv4 and ipv6 stacks for new link layers?
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:49:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200702231149.l1NBnlZD029626@moth.iki.fi> (raw)

The IPv6 and IPv4 both seem to be rather akwardly hardcoded to support
only link layers they know.

This is a pity, because it would be so easy to make the both stacks
totally independent of the actual link layers. It only needs one (or
two) new function pointer in net_device. This function should do the
conversion from IPv4/IPv6 address into corresponding hardware
multicast/broadcast address.

In both IPv4 and IPv6, all places where symbols ARPHRD_* are
reference, are suspect (there are some related to tunnels, which may
be appropriate). For example, in ipv4/arp.c arp_mc_map would call this
mapping function, if provided. Similarly ipv6/ndisc.c ndisc_mc_map.

In ipv6/addrconf.c the ivp6_generate_eui64 may possibly need yet
another netdev function provided by the driver.

The current Ethernet specific code for these mappings could be moved
from the ipv6/ipv6 into eth.c, and ether_setup would give defaults for
the functions.

[I run into this while trying to do a netdev to a device is not known
by the stacks, and IPv6 even refuses to start on it (because of the
ivp6_generate_eui64 fails?). IPv4 ARP seems to fall back to broadcast,
so it sort of starts]

-- 
Markku Savela

             reply	other threads:[~2007-02-23 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-23 11:49 Markku Savela [this message]
2007-02-23 13:47 ` Neil Horman
2007-02-24  0:26   ` David Miller
2007-02-24 16:00 ` Olaf Titz
2007-02-24 16:45   ` Markku Savela
2007-02-25  0:52     ` David Miller
2007-02-25 10:27     ` Olaf Titz
2007-02-25 11:21 Al Boldi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200702231149.l1NBnlZD029626@moth.iki.fi \
    --to=msa@moth.iki.fi \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®