From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030380AbXBZRrt (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:47:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030382AbXBZRrs (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:47:48 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:58939 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030381AbXBZRrr (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:47:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:47:47 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20070226.094747.59657430.davem@davemloft.net> To: ebiederm@xmission.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: MSI entry unlinked before arch_teardown_msi_irq(). From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20070225.154637.70478886.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 17:14:43 -0700 > David Miller writes: > > > From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) > > Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:08:07 -0700 > > > >> If that isn't the issue holler and I will look into it a little more. > > > > Talking in code is always more effective :-) > > > > This patch fixes the OOPS I was talking about: > > Ok. That is clearly reasonable. Why do you need to traverse > the list here? I just want to understand the requirements. The real problem turned out to be my using get_irq_data() instead of get_irq_msi() :-) Sorry for the noise.