From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: mbligh@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
johnstul@us.ibm.com, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [RFC] Fast assurate clock readable from user space and NMI handler
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:47:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070227044724.GB17546@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1172550161.5517.210.camel@imap.mvista.com>
* Daniel Walker (dwalker@mvista.com) wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 22:54 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > If an NMI nests over the spinlock, we have a deadlock.
>
> Maybe not completely safe ...
>
> > In addition, clock->cycle_last is a cycle_t, defined as a 64 bits on
> > x86. If is therefore not updated atomically by change_clocksource,
> > timekeeping_init, timekeeping_resume and update_wall_time. If an NMI
> > fires right on top of the update, especially around the 32 bits wrap
> > around, the time will be really fuzzy.
>
> I'm not sure that is particularly significant considering that it's just
> a possible bad timestamp, and the probability of that happening seems
> rather low .. You could also modify NMI calls so they use a different
> time stamping method, like reading the clocksource directly .
>
Since you do not disable interrupts around the clocksource read, the
same problem applies to interrupt handlers of higher priority than the
cycle_last updating code.
A bad timestamp can make a trace quite hard to follow and more
error-prone. When someone is looking for _the_ failing case in a system,
the infrastructure used to debug must be reliable. Sometimes error cases
takes days before showing up : we can't afford to be unsure about the
precision of the tracer.
Also, the goal is to have a generic monotonic timestamp readable from
everywhere. Excluding execution contexts doesn't seem like such a great
idea (it just replicates the same problem somewhere else).
> The pit clocksource could be dropped pretty easy with my clocksource
> update patches, which I'm still working on but you could easily drop
> clock sources that aren't atomic like the pit .. Also the pit is
> generally undesirable, so it's not going to be missed.
>
Still important for old architectures where PIT is the only available
clock source I guess. However, the clocksource struct should at least
tell if the time can be read atomically and offer a different API for
atomic vs non atomic read of time source, returning an error if no
atomic time source is available.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-27 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-24 21:59 [PATCH 8/16] LTTng 0.6.36 for 2.6.18 : Timestamp Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <1164475747.5196.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20061126170542.GA30771@Krystal>
[not found] ` <1164561427.16871.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20061126231833.GA22241@Krystal>
[not found] ` <1164585589.16871.52.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2007-02-24 16:19 ` [RFC] Fast assurate clock readable from user space and NMI handler Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-02-24 18:06 ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-26 20:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-02-26 21:27 ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-26 22:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-02-26 23:12 ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-27 3:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-02-27 4:22 ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-27 4:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2007-02-27 6:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-02-27 7:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-02-27 8:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-02-27 10:18 ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-27 16:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-02-27 17:24 ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-27 19:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-02-27 19:40 ` john stultz
2007-02-27 20:09 ` Daniel Walker
2007-02-27 9:59 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070227044724.GB17546@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®