mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	Amy Griffis <amy.griffis@hp.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [POWERPC] Mask 32-bit system call arguments to 32 bits on PPC64 in audit code
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:57:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070228095740.GC7870@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070222112040.GB7916@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>

On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:20:40PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:59:16PM +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > Commit:     cfcd1705b61ecce1ab102b9593cf733fef314a19
> > Parent:     0e47e3cca100e7c8e8124378e4e44969c2e042fd
> > Author:     David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> > AuthorDate: Sun Jan 14 09:38:18 2007 +0800
> > Committer:  Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> > CommitDate: Wed Jan 24 21:13:58 2007 +1100
> >  
> >     [POWERPC] Mask 32-bit system call arguments to 32 bits on PPC64 in audit code
> >     
> >     The system call entry code will clear the high bits of argument
> >     registers before invoking the system call; don't report whatever noise
> >     happens to be in the high bits of the register before that happens.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> >     Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c |   24 +++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >  
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> > index 975102a..cc44c7b 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> > @@ -532,16 +532,22 @@ void do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >  	    && (current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED))
> >  		do_syscall_trace();
> >  
> > -	if (unlikely(current->audit_context))
> > -		audit_syscall_entry(
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
> > -				    AUDIT_ARCH_PPC,
> > -#else
> > -				    test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT)?AUDIT_ARCH_PPC:AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64,
> > +	if (unlikely(current->audit_context)) {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> > +		if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT))
> > +			audit_syscall_entry(AUDIT_ARCH_PPC64,
> > +					    regs->gpr[0],
> > +					    regs->gpr[3], regs->gpr[4],
> > +					    regs->gpr[5], regs->gpr[6]);
> > +		else
> >  #endif
> > -				    regs->gpr[0],
> > -				    regs->gpr[3], regs->gpr[4],
> > -				    regs->gpr[5], regs->gpr[6]);
> > +			audit_syscall_entry(AUDIT_ARCH_PPC,
> > +					    regs->gpr[0],
> > +					    regs->gpr[3] & 0xffffffff,
> > +					    regs->gpr[4] & 0xffffffff,
> > +					    regs->gpr[5] & 0xffffffff,
> > +					    regs->gpr[6] & 0xffffffff);
> > +	}
> >  }
> >  
> >  void do_syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs)
> 
> Why is this needed? The audit code is not supposed to look at the high bits
> if the audited task is a compat task.
> It does that at at least one place in kernel/auditsc.c:
> 
> 	case 4: /* socketcall */
> 		return ((mask & AUDIT_PERM_WRITE) && ctx->argv[0] == SYS_BIND);
> 
> So does the audit code assume that the high bits are cleared or is this
> a bug in the audit code?

Extended the cc list with a few people that recently worked on the audit code,
maybe somebody could answer my question above?

      reply	other threads:[~2007-02-28  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200702081859.l18IxGWm000454@hera.kernel.org>
2007-02-22 11:20 ` Heiko Carstens
2007-02-28  9:57   ` Heiko Carstens [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070228095740.GC7870@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
    --to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=amy.griffis@hp.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®