From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc2-git3 soft lockup detected on CPU#0 (crash dump kernel)
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 12:51:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070305115111.GA10675@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6bffcb0e0703050347j5169c672g19996d5c76707123@mail.gmail.com>
* Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> wrote:
> >also below is a softlockup-debug patch that might be useful, which adds
> >a tick/tock output so it spams the console once per second but can show
> >the dynamics of lockups (and other delays).
>
> I have applied this patch
> http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/tbf/bitis-gabonica/2.6.21-rc2-git3-kdump/log3.txt
thanks. It seems that the 'BUG: soft lockup detected' message does not
occur in this log though - and that there are bootup messages between
the two sysrq outputs:
[ 221.101833] skge eth1: disabling interface
[ 228.740911] audit(1173094442.943:11): user pid=3245 uid=0
auid=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:hwclock_t:s0 msg='changing system
time: exe="/sbin/hwclock"
(hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=console res=success)'
[ 233.148571] md: md1 in immediate safe mode
plus there's trouble with irq 10:
[ 132.013194] irq 10: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
[ 132.072771] Disabling IRQ #10
that prompted you to enable irqpoll, right? So am i right that without
irqpoll there's no lockup?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-05 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-03 23:31 Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-04 14:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-04 14:36 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-04 15:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-04 16:28 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-04 16:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-04 16:47 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-04 17:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-04 17:15 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-04 17:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-05 8:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 10:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-03-05 10:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-03-05 11:47 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-05 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-03-05 12:04 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-05 12:21 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-03-05 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070305115111.GA10675@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®