mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, marcel@holtmann.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@sunset.davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 2.6.21 rfcomm lockups (2.6.21 regression)
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 13:41:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070305134153.04f97fc0@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45EB0F69.5070002@rtr.ca>

On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 13:26:49 -0500,
Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> wrote:

> The simplest fix for this bug is to prevent sysfs_move_dir()
> from self-deadlocking when (old_parent == new_parent).
> 
> This patch prevents total system lockup when using rfcomm devices.
> 
> Signed-off-by:  Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
> ---
> --- 2.6.21/fs/sysfs/dir.c	2007-03-04 13:19:00.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/fs/sysfs/dir.c	2007-03-04 13:20:45.000000000 -0500
> @@ -431,6 +431,8 @@
>  	new_parent_dentry = new_parent ?
>  		new_parent->dentry : sysfs_mount->mnt_sb->s_root;
> 
> +	if (old_parent_dentry->d_inode == new_parent_dentry->d_inode)
> +		return 0;	/* nothing to move */
>  again:
>  	mutex_lock(&old_parent_dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
>  	if (!mutex_trylock(&new_parent_dentry->d_inode->i_mutex)) {

Hm, never thought that someone might call the moving functions with
old_parent == new_parent, sorry about that. It should be safe to
return success here, we add only a bit of overhead with some driver
model juggling and emitting a not needed uevent.

Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-05 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-04 14:53 [Regression] Bluetooth RFComm: using it locks up the machine Mark Lord
2007-03-04 15:12 ` Mark Lord
2007-03-04 17:33   ` Marcel Holtmann
2007-03-04 17:55   ` Mark Lord
2007-03-04 18:26     ` [PATCH] Fix 2.6.21 rfcomm lockups (2.6.21 regression) Mark Lord
2007-03-05 12:41       ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2007-03-05 15:33       ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070305134153.04f97fc0@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
    --to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bluez-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=davem@sunset.davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®