From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933472AbXCENXQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:23:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933473AbXCENXQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:23:16 -0500 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:49216 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933472AbXCENXP (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:23:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:22:43 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: akpm@osdl.org, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: shut up vm86(2) Message-ID: <20070305142243.GB22829@bingen.suse.de> References: <20070228214046.GA5539@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070228214046.GA5539@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:40:46AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > From originally rate-limited printk, to just printk, to current version. > Everybody had enough time to learn about vm86(2) absense. I don't think that's true. I prefer to keep the message. -Andi