From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933541AbXCEPti (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:49:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933544AbXCEPth (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:49:37 -0500 Received: from dev.mellanox.co.il ([194.90.237.44]:36006 "EHLO dev.mellanox.co.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933541AbXCEPtg (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:49:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:44:45 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jens Axboe , Pavel Machek , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Michal Piotrowski , Daniel Walker , Len Brown , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2) Message-ID: <20070305154422.GA4798@mellanox.co.il> Reply-To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" References: <20070227103021.GA2250@kernel.dk> <20070227103407.GA17819@elte.hu> <20070227105922.GD2250@kernel.dk> <20070227111515.GA4271@kernel.dk> <20070301093450.GA8508@elte.hu> <20070301104117.GA22788@elte.hu> <20070301145204.GA25304@elte.hu> <20070302072100.GB30634@elte.hu> <20070302080441.GA12785@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070302080441.GA12785@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Quoting Ingo Molnar : > Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (part 2) > > > * Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > I'll try what i've described in the previous mail: mark all bisection > > points that do not include f3ccb06f as 'good' - thus 'merging' the > > known-bad area with the first known-good commit, and thus eliminating > > it from the bisection space. > > this got me quite a bit further: > > git-bisect start > git-bisect bad 01363220f5d23ef68276db8974e46a502e43d01d > git-bisect good f3ccb06f3b8e0cf42b579db21f3ca7f17fcc3f38 > git-bisect fake-good ee404566f97f9254433399fbbcfa05390c7c55f7 > git-bisect bad d43a338e395371733a80ec473b40baac5f74d768 > git-bisect bad 255f0385c8e0d6b9005c0e09fffb5bd852f3b506 > git-bisect fake-good f99c6bb6e2e9c35bd3dc0b1d0faa28bd6970930d > git-bisect fake-good 0187f221e96e3436d552c0c7143f183eb82fb658 > git-bisect bad 81450b73dde07f473a4a7208b209b4c8b7251d90 > git-bisect fake-good ef29498655b18d2bfd69048e20835d19333981ab > git-bisect fake-good 8a03d9a498eaf02c8a118752050a5154852c13bf > git-bisect good 5c95d3f5783ab184f64b7848f0a871352c35c3cf > git-bisect good ecb5f7521a309cb9c5fc0832b9705cd2a03d7d45 > git-bisect good 0539771d7236b425f285652f6f297cc7939c8f9a I just confirmed that 0539771d7236b425f285652f6f297cc7939c8f9a is good for me, too. > 81450b73dde07f473a4a7208b209b4c8b7251d90 is first bad commit Going to test that now. -- MST