From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992996AbXCIGV7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 01:21:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992995AbXCIGV7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 01:21:59 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:38205 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992993AbXCIGV6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 01:21:58 -0500 Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:21:54 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20070308.222154.74746753.davem@davemloft.net> To: peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, christopher.leech@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] NET: Multiple queue network device support REPOST From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1173420779298-git-send-email-peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> References: <1173420779298-git-send-email-peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org You didn't address my correction the other day wherein I clarified for you that my idea was not to store the queue mapping in skb->priority but rather to shrink skb->priority to a u16 and add a new u16 skb->queue_mapping or whatever field to store the necessary information. You're just posting a set of patches using the same approach again plus some bug fixes, so there is essentially nothing new for anyone to review. Why ask for feedback if you fail to take any of it into consideration? :-/