mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, safford@watson.ibm.com,
	serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjhall@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	zohar@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch 1/6] integrity: new hooks
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:42:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070308184202.GP6602@sequoia.sous-sol.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <33939.11500.qm@web36612.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

* Casey Schaufler (casey@schaufler-ca.com) wrote:
> 
> --- "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> > It's unfortunate, agreed, but
> > 
> > use of LSM as an integrity framework was also a
> > no-go.
> 
> You're going to have to justify this assertion.
> I know of at least one work-in-progress for which
> LSM works just fine. Not to mention the Integrity
> claims of SELinux.

Serge is referring to the objections to EVM/IMA
as LSM because it was not doing access control,
rather integrity measurements.  It's all in
somewhere the archives.

thanks,
-chris

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-08 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-08 16:03 Mimi Zohar
2007-03-08 16:31 ` Chris Wright
2007-03-08 17:00   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-03-08 17:17     ` Chris Wright
2007-03-08 18:30     ` Casey Schaufler
2007-03-08 18:42       ` Chris Wright [this message]
2007-03-08 18:46       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-03-08 20:38         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-03-08 20:54           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-03-08 21:57           ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070308184202.GP6602@sequoia.sous-sol.org \
    --to=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=kjhall@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=safford@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®