From: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
To: Niklaus <niklaus@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: more than 65535 outbound connections
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:04:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070309110436.GD3883@mea-ext.zmailer.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85e0e3140703090019r7daf5ce4g9269925773374bf7@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:49:34PM +0530, Niklaus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I could be wrong in the below description or might have misunderstood
> many of the concepts , please correct appropriately.
>
> 65535 ports can allowed . So on a machine namely C you can have max
> 65535 outbound connections
IP connections are quads (four-tuples), machine A and B IP addresses,
plus 16 bit port numbers at both ends.
You can have about 64 k * 3 G = 192 T connections out from a machine
to any single port number out there to all existing IP addresses.
If A.ip, B.ip, and B.port stay the same, A can setup up to some
10 - 50 thousand parallel connections. (Depending on allowed dynamic
source IP port number space at machine A.)
If either B.ip or B.port changes, A can reuse a port that is actively
connected to something. Resulting four-tuple is different -> connection
is different.
Does Linux reuse port numbers in this way ?
It most likely does, but I didn't verify.
> What i was thinking was to send to another machines A and B from the
> same port [X] and then when we get data from it to [X] we can the send
> it to the correct application using stateful mapping or storing some
> information . The machines A and B are unaware of this mapping from
> the C machine.
You want to make a "L4 switch" -- a "load balancer" ?
That thing is a NAT-box, and is really not making buffered TCP flows,
but rather mapping IP/TCP header rewriters to divert the flows to new
destinations.
> Can we increase it by anymeans in the kernel. Does we have patches for the
> above
>
> i read on the web that terry lambert has got 1.6 million simultaneous
> connection ? how is the way it is done.
>
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/277
With 50 thousand connections per single ( A.ip / B.ip / B.port ) set,
one needs only 32 B.ports or A.ip:s or B.ip:s to do that 1.6 million
parallel TCP streams.
Such does eat up lots and lots system kernel memory...
> Regs
> Nik
/Matti Aarnio
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-09 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <85e0e3140703090016h609ecc5t504121a99bcd3e44@mail.gmail.com>
2007-03-09 8:19 ` Niklaus
2007-03-09 8:36 ` Florian Weimer
2007-03-09 8:31 ` David Lang
2007-03-09 10:43 ` Niklaus
2007-03-09 11:11 ` Matti Aarnio
2007-03-09 11:04 ` Matti Aarnio [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070309110436.GD3883@mea-ext.zmailer.org \
--to=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklaus@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®