From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, serue@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] revoke: add f_light flag for struct file
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 11:08:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703091108.58371.dada1@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703091014110.32320@sbz-30.cs.Helsinki.FI>
On Friday 09 March 2007 09:14, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
>
> This adds a f_light flag to struct file to indicate that the file was
> looked up with fget_light(). Needed by revoke to ensure we don't
> close a file pointer while someone is using it without actually
> holding a reference.
>
> These bits were taken from the forced unmount patches by Tigran
> Aivazian.
Well, I disagree very much with this patch.
One of the interest of fget_light() is not dirtying file structure (avoiding
atomic changes to f_count).
You add a 'flag' (4 bytes !) at the end of the file structure (so in a
different cache line than the parts that are usually accessed in a fd_related
syscall) and dirty this part at syscall entry and exit. Thats really a heavy
price for supporting an unlikely revoke() syscall.
Also, the thing is racy.
( BTW, the whole revoke() concept is evil, especially if we want to avoid
using inodes/dentries for some kind of pseudo files like sockets / pipes)
Cannot we use a flag in 'struct files_struct', set to one when the task is
mono-thread (at task creation in fact), and set to 0 when it creates a new
thread (or when someone remotely access to this "struct files_struct"
in /proc/pid/fd/... )
No need to set back this flag to 1 when task revert to mono-threaded, since
this case is probably unlikely. This way we can be non racy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-09 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-09 8:14 Pekka J Enberg
2007-03-09 10:08 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2007-03-09 10:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-03-09 11:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-09 11:52 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-03-09 11:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-03-09 14:12 ` Alan Cox
2007-03-09 13:13 ` Pekka J Enberg
2007-03-09 16:11 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-03-09 17:02 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-03-09 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703091108.58371.dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®