From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750767AbXCJV1N (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:27:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750799AbXCJV1N (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:27:13 -0500 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:36589 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750767AbXCJV1M (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Mar 2007 16:27:12 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 22:27:30 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov , linux-kernel-list Subject: Re: PROBLEM: "Make nenuconfig" does not save parameters. Message-ID: <20070310212730.GA2577@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20070310160542.21cdb968@localhost> <20070310160614.GB10230@cvg> <20070310194617.2aef1006@localhost> <20070310175058.GA19878@cvg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 07:23:41PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > Whether the 'working config file path' should change when you do > 'Save as Alternate' or not, is a menuconfig axiom. Ask Sam Ravnborg > if you want it changed :-) Current behaviour is not logical but on the other hand I do not see a big need to make it so. It seems that people very seldom uses "save alternate" anyway. But patches are welcome. Sam