From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030417AbXCLPqC (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:46:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030433AbXCLPqC (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:46:02 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:39836 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030417AbXCLPqA (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:46:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:45:58 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Andi Kleen , "Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell Subject: Re: _proxy_pda still makes linking modules fail Message-ID: <20070312154558.GA16327@one.firstfloor.org> References: <1173315479.12472.9.camel@qrnik> <45F49E0A.3090607@goop.org> <20070312094805.GA11644@one.firstfloor.org> <45F56785.5070002@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45F56785.5070002@goop.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 07:45:25AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >> Rusty's pda->per_cpu patch will deal with this once and for all; have > >> > > > > Not on x86-64. > > > > Have you considered dropping pda in x86-64? Segment based percpu > doesn't really have any disadvantages. Maybe. > > >> you picked it up yet? > >> > > > > Not yet. > > > > There will be interactions with my paravirt+xen patches, so I'm > wondering if I should rebase onto those patches, or should we apply them > later and fix everything up? Applying them later is probably better -Andi