From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161204AbXCNMQO (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:16:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161198AbXCNMQO (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:16:14 -0400 Received: from mailmxout.mailmx.agnat.pl ([193.239.44.238]:3156 "EHLO mailmxout.mailmx.agnat.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161199AbXCNMQM convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 08:16:12 -0400 From: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz Organization: SelfOrganizing To: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iproute2 2.6.20-070313 Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:16:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl References: <20070313151549.332004c9@freekitty> <200703141223.48927.arekm@maven.pl> <45F7E527.6030307@trash.net> In-Reply-To: <45F7E527.6030307@trash.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703141316.05509.arekm@maven.pl> X-Authenticated-Id: arekm Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 14 of March 2007, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > This patch > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg27506.html > > > > didn't make into upstream linux kernel it seems. > > As mentioned in the changelog, its in 2.6.19. Hm, why no RTA_FWMASK in HEAD rtnetlink.h http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=include/linux/rtnetlink.h;h=4a629ea70cc4ca60a6f486f8653974af68dbe8cd;hb=HEAD and 2.6.19 http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=include/linux/rtnetlink.h;h=3a18addaed4ccb7436bffc9cf5fd0666f145d35c;hb=0215ffb08ce99e2bb59eca114a99499a4d06e704 ? > Last time I looked at the WRR patch it was a huge mess and > used architecture dependant types in the netlink messages. > Unless someone fixed this, adding support to iproute is a > bad idea since in case it would get merged compatibility > would break. Ok. -- Arkadiusz Mi¶kiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/