From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1161276AbXCNN0u@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1161276AbXCNN0u (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:26:50 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161279AbXCNN0u
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:26:50 -0400
Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:58895 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1161268AbXCNN0t (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 14 Mar 2007 09:26:49 -0400
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:24:07 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
To: Johann Borck <johann.borck@densedata.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
       Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>,
       Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
       Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com>,
       Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>,
       Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
       Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: considering kevent - the kernel development process
Message-ID: <20070314132405.GA14500@2ka.mipt.ru>
References: <45F6F590.8030909@densedata.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <45F6F590.8030909@densedata.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (2ka.mipt.ru [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:24:44 +0300 (MSK)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:03:44PM +0100, Johann Borck (johann.borck@densedata.com) wrote:
> So my questions are:
> 
> What in general is wrong with kevent?
> 
> What, in detail is wrong with kevent / its proposed interface?
> 
> What features are missing?
> 
> What are the (real) reasons for the way it is discussed?

Fsck it, Johann :)

It is a trend (a politics) to hide head into the sand and feel like
nothing happend - open source does not have mechanisms to force people
to do something (like comment on foreign ideas/implementations), 
so people make a look like problem does not exist and solve it using own way.

There will be tons of other interesting stuff, stay tuned :)

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov