From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S2992435AbXCOXXe@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S2992435AbXCOXXe (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:23:34 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992436AbXCOXXe
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:23:34 -0400
Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:59648 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S2992435AbXCOXXd (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:23:33 -0400
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:29:51 -0500
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       haver@vnet.ibm.com, hch@infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/22 take 3] UBI: EBA unit
Message-ID: <20070315232951.GA29295@crusty.rchland.ibm.com>
References: <20070314151934.1112.70126.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20070314152024.1112.15655.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20070315110703.1c2dcce4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070315142410.371adbf0.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070315142410.371adbf0.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 02:24:10PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:07:03 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > 
> > There's way too much code here to expect it to get decently reviewed, alas.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> /me repeats wish that Not Everything Should Be Sent to lkml.  :(

Just curious, but where would you suggest this be sent to for review then?

josh