From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753561AbXCPP5T (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:57:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753560AbXCPP5T (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:57:19 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:44803 "HELO xenotime.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753559AbXCPP5S (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:57:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:55:44 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: dedekind@infradead.org Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, haver@vnet.ibm.com, hch@infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/22 take 3] UBI: EBA unit Message-Id: <20070316075544.c8c01407.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <1174040468.31851.10.camel@sauron> References: <20070314151934.1112.70126.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20070314152024.1112.15655.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20070315110703.1c2dcce4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070315142410.371adbf0.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <1174040468.31851.10.camel@sauron> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 12:21:08 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 14:24 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > /me repeats wish that Not Everything Should Be Sent to lkml. :( > > If you do statement like this, please, provide reasons why you say it > for these patches and suggest something _constructive_. I do not see any > point in this vague phrase. so do you believe that Everything (that is kernel-related) should be sent to lkml? > And please, note, I was directed here by David Woodhouse who is MTD > maintainer because he thinks the patch is large and needs more people to > look at it, not just him. As I wrote to Mr. Boyer, that makes sense in this case. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***