From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752642AbXCSJU0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:20:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752607AbXCSJU0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:20:26 -0400 Received: from minus.inr.ac.ru ([194.67.69.97]:54253 "HELO ms2.inr.ac.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752423AbXCSJUY (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:20:24 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ms2.inr.ac.ru; b=j57md+G99+Bj5dZ/zvy/PmS95Qo8D52OEczeic4cdtXQmJp8ZOLXMJZ4IxvmNrOPGtc2grbD5Zk/iCLfuWKqVgQQqb/w54Sgqj6rGVE9EczQg/a00ZaN1chOTa6H9BBQN9kdK6R44psd49hpQcQGpLf5MrdQSHvskqApxtPgh1w=; Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:20:09 +0300 From: Alexey Kuznetsov To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , general@lists.openfabrics.org Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: dst_ifdown breaks infiniband? Message-ID: <20070319092009.GA9387@ms2.inr.ac.ru> References: <20070318155532.GG7958@mellanox.co.il> <20070318191238.GA20518@ms2.inr.ac.ru> <20070318202559.GD11078@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > Well I don't think the loopback device is currently but as soon > as we get network namespace support we will have multiple loopback > devices and they will get unregistered when we remove the network > namespace. There is no logical difference. At the moment when namespace is gone there is nobody who can hold unrevokable references to this loopback. Alexey