From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752618AbXCSKx4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:53:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752253AbXCSKx4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:53:56 -0400 Received: from mail.screens.ru ([213.234.233.54]:40337 "EHLO mail.screens.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752568AbXCSKx4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:53:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:53:58 +0300 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, take2] getrusage() : Fill ru_inblock and ru_oublock fields if possible Message-ID: <20070319105358.GA152@tv-sign.ru> References: <200703191139.40281.dada1@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703191139.40281.dada1@cosmosbay.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/19, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > +static inline unsigned long task_io_get_inblock(const struct task_struct *p) > +{ > + return p->ioac.read_bytes >> 9; > +} > > [...snip...] > > @@ -2021,6 +2022,8 @@ static void k_getrusage(struct task_stru > r->ru_nivcsw = p->signal->cnivcsw; > r->ru_minflt = p->signal->cmin_flt; > r->ru_majflt = p->signal->cmaj_flt; > + r->ru_inblock = p->signal->cinblock; > + r->ru_oublock = p->signal->coublock; > > if (who == RUSAGE_CHILDREN) > break; > @@ -2032,6 +2035,8 @@ static void k_getrusage(struct task_stru > r->ru_nivcsw += p->signal->nivcsw; > r->ru_minflt += p->signal->min_flt; > r->ru_majflt += p->signal->maj_flt; > + r->ru_inblock += task_io_get_inblock(p->signal); p->signal is "struct signal_struct *", not "struct task_struct *" as task_io_get_inblock() expects ? Oleg.