From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753324AbXCTH1m (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:27:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753336AbXCTH1m (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:27:42 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.24]:51302 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753324AbXCTH1l (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 03:27:41 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:27:32 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Stefan Priebe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.20 does not work anymore with SCSI or SATA on old Opteron / Xeon servers Message-Id: <20070319232732.854d7120.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <45FDA626.9000404@prie.be> References: <45FDA626.9000404@prie.be> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:50:46 +0100 Stefan Priebe wrote: > Hello! > > We've a very strange Problem with Kernel 2.6.20.x > > If i try to access a SCSI or SATA Disk (tested with Adaptec U320 > ASC-29320, ICP Vortex 9024, Promise TX300) the whole server hangs - no > output - no error on the screen - but it hangs completely. But it does > not happen on all our systems affected are only old 604pin xeons and > socket 940 Opterons. Socket F Opteron or 771 Xeons does work fine. > > I've also testet apci=off pci=routeirq but both does not help. The > systems work fine with 2.6.19.x and before. Well that's a bit sad. Could you please set up netconsole (Documentation/networking/netconsole.txt) and add initcall_debug to the kernel boot command line and then send us the full bootup logs? (Even better: serial console with earlyprintk). If that doesn't shed any light, we might have to ask you to perform a git-bisect search to find the buggy commit, I'm afraid.