From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752856AbXCTTwW (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:52:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753795AbXCTTwW (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:52:22 -0400 Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.13]:48061 "EHLO smtprelay01.ispgateway.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752856AbXCTTwV (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:52:21 -0400 From: Ingo Oeser To: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: vfs_cache_divisor Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:53:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "J.H." , kernel list References: <20061214223718.GA3816@elf.ucw.cz> <45A0041F.4060903@zytor.com> <20070319122740.286f602e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20070319122740.286f602e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703202053.01615.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Randy, On Monday 19 March 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Were there any patches written after this? If so, I missed them. > If not, does this patch help any? How is division by zero avoided? Maybe one can avoid setting it to zero. Regards Ingo Oeser