From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965668AbXCVEUU (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:20:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965671AbXCVEUU (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:20:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:39716 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965668AbXCVEUT (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:20:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:17:51 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , Andi Kleen , "Robert P. J. Day" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete obsolete RAW driver feature. Message-ID: <20070322041751.GB17159@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Willy Tarreau , Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , Andi Kleen , "Robert P. J. Day" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk References: <20070320165736.GA19781@redhat.com> <20070320181442.1ae73295@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070321151952.02b5612d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070322001050.13588e5e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070321161341.0f87ed60.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070321232433.GX943@1wt.eu> <20070321234318.GE9092@redhat.com> <20070322041242.GA29741@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070322041242.GA29741@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 05:12:42AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:43:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:24:33AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > > > > Then a printk() on every open() should be enough. We've all been seeing > > > "Warning: tcpdump uses obsolete AF_PACKET"... and it finally disappeared. > > > > There's a difference. We have the source for tcpdump. > > But what's the problem with "warning: process XXX uses obsolete raw driver > and may not work anymore after 2007/XX/XX if not fixed" ? The target audience isn't going to read it. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk