From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, safford@watson.ibm.com,
serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjhall@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
zohar@us.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 7/7] IBAC Patch
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 23:10:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070322231012.GB4064@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070325163113.GB6753@vino.hallyn.com>
Hi!
> > > This is a new Integrity Based Access Control(IBAC) LSM module which
> > > bases access control decisions on the new integrity framework services.
> > > IBAC is a sample LSM module to help clarify the interaction between
> > > LSM and Linux Integrity Modules(LIM).
> > >
> > > - Updated Kconfig SECURITY_IBAC description
> > > and SECURITY_IBAC_BOOTPARAM default value
> > > - Prefixed all log messages with "ibac:"
> > > - Redefined a couple of 'int' variables as 'static int'
> > >
> > > signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > > Index: linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/security/ibac/Kconfig
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc4-mm1/security/ibac/Kconfig
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> > > +config SECURITY_IBAC
> > > + boolean "IBAC support"
> > > + depends on SECURITY && SECURITY_NETWORK && INTEGRITY
> > > + help
> > > + Integrity Based Access Control(IBAC) uses the Linux
> > > + Integrity Module(LIM) API calls to verify an executable's
> > > + metadata and data's integrity. Based on the results,
> > > + execution permission is permitted/denied. Integrity
> > > + providers may implement the LIM hooks differently. For
> > > + more information on integrity verification refer to the
> > > + specific integrity provider documentation.
> >
> > ...sounds like pseudosecurity piece of **** whose only purpose is to
> > prevent computer's owner to hack his own system?
> >
> > Why do we want it?
>
> I assume, as it says not too far above, we want it as
>
> "a sample LSM module to help clarify the interaction between LSM
> and Linux Integrity Modules(LIM)"
>
> Since the LIM stuff is infrastructure code, a simple user is nice of her
> to provide, like the root_plug LSM.
>
> Perhaps the comments should warn that using this for real by itself
> would be trivial to work around?
Certainly. And I'm not sure if we are not carying enough example code
already :-).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-27 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-23 16:10 Mimi Zohar
2007-03-25 12:38 ` Pavel Machek
2007-03-25 16:31 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-03-22 23:10 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070322231012.GB4064@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kjhall@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=safford@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=serue@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®