From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933358AbXCZW0A (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:26:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933414AbXCZW0A (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:26:00 -0400 Received: from smtp109.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.208]:34397 "HELO smtp109.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933358AbXCZWZ7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:25:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=xVkjp0K9/hCc2c4zkRkK2joQfN1eqFqDshXsgVNBSEoC8AsGOylPHUrynA+dusbhCE9kq6oZgX0WMkxD+Mn7gf5yreI9JOICofp/USqGzR8Bl4HVSC3SRpWKBaraZm5ghinhFyUCijl4wIdp22A65cXTPiJM/uZO2t2o3IsXwl8= ; X-YMail-OSG: fJa0bJUVM1kL3QRde5cK855JxrA_dhtYK6PIj0bIDVcIe24lPI3_FOBY.7CHk9lSj_tM58RJJFy2utYQJFuv_.FjhuKopMbiJWXTCg4UCnlD2dR7J1re_3k6.zK9AvvPtY.lw2klG_REaETpKee6pLkz6A-- From: David Brownell To: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.21-rc5 1/3] parport->dev driver model support Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:25:56 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Linux Kernel list , Jean Delvare References: <200703260906.19442.david-b@pacbell.net> <20070326145942.a090d277.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20070326145942.a090d277.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703261525.56731.david-b@pacbell.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 26 March 2007 2:59 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:06:19 -0700 > David Brownell wrote: > > > Currently a parport_driver can't get a handle on the device node for the > > underlying parport (PNPACPI, PCI, etc). That prevents correct placement > > of sysfs child nodes, which can affect things like power management. > > > > This patch adds a field to "struct parport" pointing to that device node, > > and updates non-legacy port drivers to initialize that device pointer. > > That field replaces the analagous PCI-only support in parport_pc. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Brownell > > --- > > NOTE this depends on an earlier patch to make pnp devices set up DMA, > > parport is the primary user of legacy i8237 dma infrastructure. > > Confusion reigns. > > To which "earlier patch" do you refer? The one named "init-dma-masks-in-pnp_dev.patch" in 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 ...