From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752619AbXC0Ur3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:47:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752684AbXC0Ur3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:47:29 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:51927 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752619AbXC0Ur3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:47:29 -0400 Message-Id: <20070327202234.639415000@strauss.suse.de> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-14 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:22:34 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [patch 0/7] Add IRQF_IRQPOLL flag to allow irqpoll Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org irqpoll is broken on some architectures that don't use the IRQ 0 for the timer interrupt like IA64. This patch adds a IRQF_IRQPOLL flag. Each architecture is handled in a separate pach. As I left the irq == 0 as condition, this should not break existing architectures that use timer_irq == 0 and that I did't address with that patch (because I don't know). Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle