From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965379AbXC1AQ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:16:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965370AbXC1AQ1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:16:27 -0400 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([217.147.92.49]:38280 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965365AbXC1AQ0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:16:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:16:10 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, kyle@canonical.com Message-ID: <20070328001610.GB25551@srcf.ucam.org> References: <20070323191321.5d00887a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20070328000851.GA25551@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070328000851.GA25551@srcf.ucam.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@codon.org.uk Subject: Re: HPA patches X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 20 Jun 2006 01:35:45 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vavatch.codon.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:08:52AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > ata3.01: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 234441648, hpa_sectors = 0 ^ Does this just indicate the lack of an hpa? If so, the /* if no hpa, both should be equal */ comment seems to be wrong (or, alternatively, it's the ata_read_native_max_address_ext call that's failing and returning garbage? I'll look into that) -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org