mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] i386: Remove page sized slabs for pgds and pmds
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:45:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070328134511.0d61ec8f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703281309210.12985@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:12:56 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:

> The benefit of preconstructed pgds and pmds in the i386 arch code seem to
> be debatable. The performance measurements indicate that there may be a slight
> benefit but it seems to almost vanish in the noise ratio.

yeah, I did a couple hours testing with rc5, rc5+quicklists,
rc5+quicklists+qlhack, where "qlhack" is my patch which removes the
quicklists and mysteriously causes i386 to crash.

I was testing 8-way x86_64 with patch-scripts (wildly fork-intensive),
kernel build and lmbench.

Basically I was unable to observe any statistically meaningful-looking
differences between any of them.

I would like to test qlhack on ia64, because ia64 puts pte-pages into the
quicklists as well, but my ia64 machine is presently indisposed.

My (much) preferred way to handle all this is to remove the quicklists from
all architectures: just use alloc_page() and free_page() for pte pages, pmd
pages, etc.  I remain unaware of any testing whcih indicates that this
would be a bad change.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-28 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-28 20:12 Christoph Lameter
2007-03-28 20:45 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-03-28 21:05   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-28 21:16     ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-28 21:20       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-28 22:37         ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-28 23:44           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-29  0:53             ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-29  1:09               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-29  1:17     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2007-03-28 20:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-28 21:00   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-28 21:24     ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-28 21:38       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-28 22:01         ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-28 22:22           ` Christoph Lameter
2007-03-29  0:28           ` Alan Cox
2007-03-29  0:59             ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-28 22:26 ` Chris Wright
2007-03-28 22:33   ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-28 22:45     ` Chris Wright
2007-03-28 23:42     ` Zachary Amsden
2007-03-28 22:47       ` Chris Wright

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070328134511.0d61ec8f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®