mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
To: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jiri Kosina" <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stuart_hayes@dell.com,
	zaitcev@redhat.com
Subject: Re: usb hid: reset NumLock
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:54:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070330125437.b3229471.zaitcev@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d120d5000703301114r420a9604i34b6a015e6bad285@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:14:20 -0400, "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I didn't like a) layering violation, and b) that they defeat filtering
> > unconditionally. Why have any filtering then?
> >
> > Instead, I propose for USB HID driver to reset NumLock on probe. Like this:
> >
> > --- a/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c

> This is fine and that's what we do in atkbd probe but maybe we should
> move that in input core and reset leds as part of
> input_register_device()?

Sure, as long as it works. I think (as much as I understand), that we
already attempt to do this indirectly. input_register_device invokes
->start handlers, and the kbd_start attempts to reset LEDs, but fails
because of the state filtering.

-- Pete

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-30 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-30 17:59 Pete Zaitcev
2007-03-30 18:14 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-03-30 19:54   ` Pete Zaitcev [this message]
2007-03-30 20:29     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-03-31 19:35 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-03-31 22:43   ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-02  5:24   ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-02 14:48     ` Jiri Kosina
2007-04-02 23:12       ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-03  5:04         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-04-03  6:24           ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-03  8:52         ` Jiri Kosina
2007-04-03  8:57           ` [linux-usb-devel] " Robert Marquardt
2007-04-03  9:32             ` Jiri Kosina
2007-04-05  3:24           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-04-05  8:50             ` Jiri Kosina
2007-04-05 20:38               ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-05 20:54                 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-04-05 21:22                   ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-01 11:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-01 16:16   ` Pete Zaitcev
2007-04-02  4:10   ` Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070330125437.b3229471.zaitcev@redhat.com \
    --to=zaitcev@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=stuart_hayes@dell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome