From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, hugh@veritas.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
oneukum@suse.de, maneesh@in.ibm.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net,
James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD driver-core] Lifetime problems of the current driver model
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:40:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070330154042.4c7deb72@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <460D0E78.3040200@gmail.com>
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:19:52 +0900,
Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Shouldn't getting/putting the module refcount be solely done in
> > kobject.c? Grab the module reference when the kobject is created and
> > release the module reference in kobject_cleanup() after the release
> > function has been called. This doesn't make kobject_get() heavier, and
> > it ensures we don't delete the module until after the last kobject it is
> > supposed to clean up has been released.
>
> If we do that, we wouldn't be able to unload a module if there is any
> kobject referencing it even when the node has no openers, so no easy way
> out there. :-(
But we must not unload the module when there is still a kobject around
referencing a release function in the module, or we will oops if the
kobject is finally released. If needed, the module must clean up its
kobjects in its exit function.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-30 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-30 9:43 Tejun Heo
2007-03-30 12:29 ` James Bottomley
2007-03-30 13:15 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-03-30 17:58 ` James Bottomley
2007-03-30 18:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-03-30 13:38 ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-30 17:41 ` Greg KH
2007-03-30 18:19 ` James Bottomley
2007-04-01 19:59 ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-02 9:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-02 15:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-04-03 3:08 ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-02 9:33 ` Greg KH
2007-04-02 12:10 ` Maneesh Soni
2007-04-02 19:33 ` Luben Tuikov
2007-03-30 13:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-03-30 13:19 ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-30 13:40 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2007-03-30 13:58 ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-30 14:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-03-30 15:08 ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-30 19:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-03-31 3:12 ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-31 3:15 ` Tejun Heo
2007-03-31 16:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2007-03-31 16:14 ` Tejun Heo
2007-04-02 19:24 ` Luben Tuikov
2007-03-30 17:38 ` Greg KH
2007-04-07 15:48 Alan Stern
2007-04-08 2:55 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070330154042.4c7deb72@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=oneukum@suse.de \
--cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®