From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933613AbXCaEz4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:55:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933541AbXCaEzD (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:55:03 -0400 Received: from [212.12.190.20] ([212.12.190.20]:32891 "EHLO raad.intranet" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933589AbXCaEyi (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 00:54:38 -0400 From: Al Boldi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:58:15 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703310758.15339.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mike Galbraith wrote: > Yesterday, I piddled around with tracking interactive backlog as a way > to detect when the load isn't really an interactive load, that's very > simple and has potential. You may want to consider fixing latencies per nice relative to load, as the biggest problem with iab are huge latency delays, which exhibit themselves as starvation, caused by unfair timeslice management. Thanks! -- Al