From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753398AbXCaQo2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:44:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753394AbXCaQo2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:44:28 -0400 Received: from ellpspace.math.ualberta.ca ([129.128.207.67]:42700 "EHLO ellpspace.math.ualberta.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753398AbXCaQo1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:44:27 -0400 Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:42:21 -0600 From: Michal Jaegermann To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [1/4] 2.6.21-rc5: known regressions (v2) Message-ID: <20070331164221.GA14671@ellpspace.math.ualberta.ca> Reply-To: michal@harddata.com References: <20070330213209.GM14134@stusta.de> <20070331002310.GA3213@ellpspace.math.ualberta.ca> <20070331150123.GU14134@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070331150123.GU14134@stusta.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 05:01:23PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 06:23:10PM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:32:09PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > > Subject : kernels fail to boot with drives on ATIIXP controller > > > (ACPI/IRQ related) > > > References : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229621 > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/257 > > > Submitter : Michal Jaegermann > > > Status : unknown > > > > I have now even better one with pata_via. A kernel, which for > > all practical purposes is 2.6.21-rc5, not only refuses to boot > > (and I cannot find some option combination which would allow me to > > do so anyway) but simply refuses to read _any_ data from a media. > > This included a partitioning information. > > > > Earlier kernel on the same hardware boots without raising any fuss. > > > > Details are collected as > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234650 > > If I understand this correctly, a plain 2.6.20 kernel is already broken? You mean that a quoted report talks about 2.6.20-1.3025.fc7 kernel? These are vagaries of kernel version numbering in Fedora. Changelogs are not that clear but it appears that 2.6.19-1.2911.6.4.fc6 will be actually closer to 2.6.20. That kernel from a bug report is really, for all intents and purposes, 2.6.21-rc5 (if I am not misreading something). I am afraid that I do not have at this moment an easy to way to check "plain" 2.6.20 on the hardware in question. It appears that the essential difference is that a working kernel is using and old IDE driver, and sees the drive - in this case - as /dev/hdc, while the current one tries to go through libata and chockes uncontrollably. Michal