From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753240AbXCaQGI (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:06:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753232AbXCaQGI (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:06:08 -0400 Received: from mtagate7.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.156]:41351 "EHLO mtagate7.de.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753240AbXCaQGF (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:06:05 -0400 Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:08:06 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Tejun Heo Cc: gregkh@suse.de, hugh@veritas.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, oneukum@suse.de, maneesh@in.ibm.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net, James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, Jeff Garzik , lkml , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , SCSI Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFD driver-core] Lifetime problems of the current driver model Message-ID: <20070331180806.55d572c8@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <460DD1B0.4080605@gmail.com> References: <460CDBA6.5030608@gmail.com> <20070330151926.18fc12a0@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <460D0E78.3040200@gmail.com> <20070330154042.4c7deb72@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <460D178F.4000500@gmail.com> <20070330165251.7beffc7c@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <460D27E3.2050602@gmail.com> <20070330213101.7aa7babf@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <460DD1B0.4080605@gmail.com> Organization: IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-Legal: IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Johann Weihen =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Gesch=E4ftsf=FChrung:?= Herbert Kircher Sitz der Gesellschaft: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?B=F6blingen?= Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:12:48 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Hm, but as long as dk0 is registered, it can be looked up and someone > > could get a reference on it. > > Yeah, exactly. That's why any getting any kobject reference backed by a > module must be accompanied by try_module_get(). > > int mydrv_get_dk(struct dk *dk) > { > rc = try_module_get(mydrv); > if (rc) > return rc; > kobject_get(&dk->kobj); > return 0; > } This works if the caller always knows which module to grab (I was thinking about some tree-walking code). > Exactly, in that case, module reference count must not be zero. You and > I are saying the same thing. Why are we running in circle? I hope we're not, it just makes one dizzy :) I'll think some more about it...