From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753370AbXDBHVV (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:21:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753373AbXDBHVU (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:21:20 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:44336 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753370AbXDBHVT (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:21:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:21:11 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Dave Sperry Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Poor UDP performance using 2.6.21-rc5-rt5 Message-ID: <20070402072111.GA21356@elte.hu> References: <461004CE.1030009@ieee.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <461004CE.1030009@ieee.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Dave Sperry wrote: > I have a dual core Opteron machine that exhibits poor UDP performance > (RT consumes more than 2X cpu) with the 2.6.21-rc5-rt5 as compared to > 2.6.21-rc5. Top shows the IRQ handler consuming a lot of CPU. update: even with acpi_pm clocksource on vanilla i can reproduce similar overhead using netperf. Ingo