From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753202AbXDBHWI (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:22:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753376AbXDBHWH (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:22:07 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:35664 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753202AbXDBHWE (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Apr 2007 03:22:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:22:02 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch] enhance initcall_debug, measure latency Message-ID: <20070402072202.GC24269@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20070401181614.GA25648@elte.hu> <20070401182801.GA25956@elte.hu> <20070402070907.GA18480@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070402070907.GA18480@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > initcall 0xc1f5487d ran for 23083 msecs: pca_isa_init+0x0/0x143() > > > initcall 0xc1f54fba ran for 17121 msecs: pcf8574_init+0x0/0x20() > > > > e.g. those just look like bugs. > > it's ok i think: it's ISA so it spends its time fairly to tickle the > ports in a loop. 23 or 17 seconds long? That's just broken imho. I presume one could define a background_module_init() for those, but it's still buggy. -Andi