From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: getting processor numbers
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:39:27 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070404083927.GA100@tv-sign.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070403162349.583adf84.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 04/03, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 16:00:50 -0700
> Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > If there is possibility to treat this case special and make it faster,
> > please do so. It would be best to allow pid==0 as a special case so
> > that callers don't have to find out the TID (which they shouldn't have
> > to know).
> >
>
> OK.
>
> Does anyone see a reason why we cannot do this?
>
> --- a/kernel/sched.c~sched_getaffinity-speedup
> +++ a/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -4381,8 +4381,12 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, cpumas
> struct task_struct *p;
> int retval;
>
> - lock_cpu_hotplug();
> - read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + if (pid) {
> + lock_cpu_hotplug();
> + read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> + } else {
> + preempt_disable(); /* Prevent CPU hotplugging */
> + }
But we don't need tasklist_lock at all, we can use rcu_read_lock/unlock.
Q: don't we need task_rq_lock() to read ->cpus_allowed "atomically" ?
UNTESTED.
--- OLD/kernel/sched.c~ 2007-04-03 13:05:02.000000000 +0400
+++ OLD/kernel/sched.c 2007-04-04 12:29:04.000000000 +0400
@@ -4433,22 +4433,17 @@ long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, cpumas
int retval;
mutex_lock(&sched_hotcpu_mutex);
- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
p = find_process_by_pid(pid);
if (!p) {
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
mutex_unlock(&sched_hotcpu_mutex);
return -ESRCH;
}
- /*
- * It is not safe to call set_cpus_allowed with the
- * tasklist_lock held. We will bump the task_struct's
- * usage count and then drop tasklist_lock.
- */
get_task_struct(p);
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
retval = -EPERM;
if ((current->euid != p->euid) && (current->euid != p->uid) &&
@@ -4523,7 +4518,7 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, cpumas
int retval;
mutex_lock(&sched_hotcpu_mutex);
- read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
retval = -ESRCH;
p = find_process_by_pid(pid);
@@ -4537,7 +4532,7 @@ long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, cpumas
cpus_and(*mask, p->cpus_allowed, cpu_online_map);
out_unlock:
- read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
mutex_unlock(&sched_hotcpu_mutex);
if (retval)
return retval;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-04 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-03 16:54 Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:30 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-04-03 17:37 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:56 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2007-04-03 18:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 17:17 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:22 ` Alan Cox
2007-04-03 17:30 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 20:24 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-03 17:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 17:30 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:35 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 17:45 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:58 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 18:05 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 18:11 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-03 18:21 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 17:44 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-03 17:59 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 19:40 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-03 20:13 ` Ingo Oeser
2007-04-03 23:38 ` J.A. Magallón
2007-04-03 19:55 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 20:13 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-04-03 20:19 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 20:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-03 20:20 ` Nathan Lynch
2007-04-03 19:15 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-04-03 19:32 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-04 0:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 0:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-04 0:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 5:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04 5:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 5:22 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-04-04 5:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-04 5:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04 5:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-03 20:16 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <4612BB89.8040102@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20070403141348.9bcdb13e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2007-04-03 22:13 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 22:48 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-03 23:00 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-03 23:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-03 23:54 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-04 2:55 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 8:39 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2007-04-04 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-04 8:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-04 10:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-04-04 2:58 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 3:04 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 2:52 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 2:04 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 6:47 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-04 7:02 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-04 14:51 ` Cliff Wickman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070404083927.GA100@tv-sign.ru \
--to=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®