From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750961AbXDDSi1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:38:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753924AbXDDSh6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:37:58 -0400 Received: from agminet01.oracle.com ([141.146.126.228]:44902 "EHLO agminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753917AbXDDShl (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:37:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 11:39:25 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/90] Post 2.6.21 OMAP update Message-Id: <20070404113925.da221efc.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <20070404182728.GK29129@atomide.com> References: <11757088774110-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <20070404182728.GK29129@atomide.com> Organization: Oracle Linux Eng. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:27:30 -0400 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Tony Lindgren [070404 14:02]: > > Hi all, > > > > Attached is a rather large OMAP update for post 2.6.21. > > > > OMAP is a series of ARM processors from Texas Instruments > > used in various cell phones and PDAs. > > > > The patch series is based on code that has been brewing > > in the linux-omap tree since last fall. > > > > We'd like to switch the linux-omap tree to use the mainline > > tree for core omap stuff, and this series attemps to do it > > for most part. > > > > As the patch series is big, Andrew Morton asked me to post > > it to LKML instead of linux-arm-kernel list for a wider review, > > so please comment on the patches if you have a chance! > > > > The patches touch only omap specific code at: > > > > arch/arm/Kconfig > > arch/arm/plat-omap > > arch/arm/mach-omap1 > > arch/arm/mach-omap2 > > include/asm-arm/arch-omap > > Looks like using git-send-email --chain-reply-to with this many > messages is not a good idea... The threading gets nested too wide :) That's only a problem when there are patches to be reviewed. Hence, do more frequent postings of fewer patches per series. That will likely also get you more reviewers. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***