From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753014AbXDEBab (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 21:30:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753016AbXDEBab (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 21:30:31 -0400 Received: from 216-99-217-87.dsl.aracnet.com ([216.99.217.87]:40415 "EHLO sous-sol.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753010AbXDEBaa (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Apr 2007 21:30:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:29:56 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , William Lee Irwin III , lkml Subject: Re: [patch 07/20] Allow paravirt backend to choose kernel PMD sharing Message-ID: <20070405012956.GM19575@sequoia.sous-sol.org> References: <20070404191151.009821039@goop.org> <20070404191205.392155702@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Christoph Lameter (clameter@sgi.com) wrote: > Acked-by: Christoph Lameter > > for all thats worth since I am not a i386 specialist. > > How much of the issues with page struct sharing between slab and arch code > does this address? I think the answer is 'none yet.' It uses page sized slab and still needs pgd_list, for example. But the mm_list chaining should work too, so it shouldn't make things any worse. thanks, -chris